Monitor Suite | Converge | Secured Research | Molloy Associates | Equipment Finance Originator | ABF Journal | STRIPES Leadership
Monday, March 23, 2026
MonitorDaily
Subscribe
Funding Directory
Services Directory
  • News
    • People
    • Deals
    • Data and Economy
    • All News
  • Magazine
    • All Magazines
    • Monitor Nominations & Lists
    • Meet Our Editorial Board
  • Features
    • Podcasts and Livestreams
    • Articles
    • Web Exclusives
    • Equipment Finance Originator
  • Monitor Rankings
    • Monitor Rankings
    • Monitor Nominations & Lists
  • Events
    • LeadHer Women’s Leadership Summit
    • Converge Virtual Experience: Credit & Risk
  • Industry Jobs
    • Jobs
    • Recruiting
    • Talent Development
  • Advertise with Monitor
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • People
    • Deals
    • Data and Economy
    • All News
  • Magazine
    • All Magazines
    • Monitor Nominations & Lists
    • Meet Our Editorial Board
  • Features
    • Podcasts and Livestreams
    • Articles
    • Web Exclusives
    • Equipment Finance Originator
  • Monitor Rankings
    • Monitor Rankings
    • Monitor Nominations & Lists
  • Events
    • LeadHer Women’s Leadership Summit
    • Converge Virtual Experience: Credit & Risk
  • Industry Jobs
    • Jobs
    • Recruiting
    • Talent Development
  • Advertise with Monitor
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
MonitorDaily
No Result
View All Result

EisnerAmper: Only 22% of Employers Monitor AI Usage; 36% Have AI Policy

A new EisnerAmper survey reveals a striking gap between employees and employers when it comes to AI usage. While 80% of employees report a net positive experience using AI at work, just 36% indicate their company has a formal AI policy in place.

byBrianna Wilson
August 21, 2025
in Data and Economy, EF News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on LinkedInShare on X


Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly popular in the workplace. However, new research conducted by global business advisory firm EisnerAmper in summer 2025 found only 22% of U.S. full-time desk workers with a bachelor’s degree or higher and who have used AI for work in the past 12 months report that their employer actively monitors their AI usage.

The survey reveals a striking gap between employees and employers when it comes to AI usage. While 80% of employees report a net positive experience using AI at work, just 36% indicate their company has a formal AI policy in place. Despite 84% of managers acknowledging some level of AI use among their teams, only 41% of employees inform their manager or seek permission before using AI. Notably, 60% of employees rely on free AI platforms rather than internally developed platforms (24%) or external AI tools paid for by the company (43%) and 28% admit they would use AI at work even if it were banned.

“These results point to a communication gap between employers and employees,” Jen Clark, director of technology enablement at EisnerAmper, said. “Employees are citing a lack of oversight and employers now have a valuable opportunity to not only establish a comprehensive AI strategy but also to communicate it effectively to their teams.”

Employee Usage of AI

Employees are increasingly using AI at work, but the large majority (68%) report regularly finding errors with the technology. Despite this, confidence in AI is strong: 82% are either “very” or “somewhat” confident about accurate and satisfactory outputs from AI, while only 15% say they are “not very” or “not at all” confident.

Given this, employees report that they are saving time using AI and spending it elsewhere. The majority say they are leveraging AI to be more productive, with 64% of respondents saying they use the time saved by using AI to complete more work. However, some employees indicated they are using time saved for personal reasons, like going on a walk (19%) or to lunch (16%).

“Employees are rapidly integrating AI into their daily tasks. But without a deliberate employer strategy regarding transparency and communication, companies risk losing momentum in innovation,” Mary Rizzuti, partner and practice lead of compensation resources at EisnerAmper, said. “It’s crucial that HR business partners equip employees with the right tools, training and policies to integrate AI responsibly and effectively.”

AI, Job Security and Employee Experience

The survey reveals that 52% of employees who use AI at work are “somewhat” or “very concerned” about potential job displacement/changes due to AI. Concern is highest in sectors like wholesale trade (67%) and media and communications (62%), while employees in industries like real estate (37%) express the least worry. The highest industry adopters of AI in human resources are in wholesale trade (33%) and restaurants, travel and lodging (25%).

While only 20% of employees surveyed say AI was used in their onboarding process, more than nine in ten (92%) of those who experienced this said having AI used in that context positively impacted their feelings toward the company. However, respondents were split on their feelings about AI involvement in the performance review process: 33% said it would have a net positive impact on their feelings toward the company, while 35% said it would have a negative impact on their feelings toward the company.

Generational Gaps in AI Usage

Sentiment toward AI at work varies widely by generation, with the youngest workers feeling more positive toward AI than their older counterparts. Of more than 1,000 employees surveyed, 59% of those aged 18-34 who use AI at work say they are happier as a result, compared to only 29% of respondents aged 55+. Interestingly, the majority of respondents (77%) said AI made them more productive at work, with the younger cohort (18-34) reporting the highest levels at 84%.

As AI permeates the corporate workforce, some employers are turning toward the technology to aid in performance reviews—but younger respondents are the ones who feel most comfortable with AI having an impact on the review process. For respondents aged 18-34, 45% said AI in their performance reviews would have a positive impact on their feelings toward their company, compared to only 10% of those aged 55+. Precisely half (50%) of respondents aged 55+ said using AI in performance reviews would have a negative impact on their feelings. A clear majority (74%) say someone should be compensated for their AI job experience.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Letter from the Editor — 2025 Most Influential People in Equipment Finance

License And Disclosure Requirements Across The U.S.A. Pt. 2

3 weeks ago
Beyond First Impressions: The Case for Neurodiversity in Hiring

Ideas or Execution? That is the AI Question.

4 days ago

About Us

For over 50 years, the brands of RAM Holdings have been a leader in commercial finance industry publishing, events, talent development, and research.

Our Brands

  • Monitor
  • Monitor Suite
  • Converge
  • Secured Research
  • Molloy Associates
  • Equipment Finance Originator
  • ABF Journal
  • STRIPES Leadership

Learn More

  • Monitor Rankings
  • Advertise with Monitor
  • Industry Jobs
  • Funding Source Directory
  • Service Provider Directory
  • Subscriptions

Newsletter

The daily driver for equipment finance industry executives for over 50 years. Sign up now.

SUBSCRIBE

© 2026 RAM Group Holdings - A Leading Commercial Finance Publishing Group For Over 50 Years

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • EF News
    • People
    • Deals
    • Companies
  • Magazine
    • Meet Our Editorial Board
    • Monitor Nominations & Lists
  • Features
    • Equipment Finance Originator
  • Monitor Rankings
  • Equipment Finance Jobs
  • Events
    • Monitor Women’s Leadership Summit 2026
    • Converge Virtual Experience: Credit & Risk
  • Advertise with Monitor
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact Us
Funding Source Directory
Service Provider Directory

© 2026 RAM Group Holdings - A Leading Commercial Finance Publishing Group For Over 50 Years